Just defended the infamous research proposal and was expecting to come out of it feeling better, but instead my stomach hurts a bit and my mouth is dry and I feel more like I have just been given a parking ticket than like I just completed, for better or worse, a critical part of my studies here.
I don't think things went badly. The external reviewer took up most of the time asking questions that seemed reasonable and relevant, a marked (and welcome) change from past discussions of my research proposal. I feel pretty confident that I answered the questions well and demonstrated some capability. Our nefarious head of research was as usual negative, but this was expected and since the external guy took up so much time, her venom was enhanced by irritation at having only five minutes to inform me that she still does not see the scientific value of my proposed work. (I was amused to see the external reviewer's eyebrows shoot up wonderingly at this remark.)
Going in to this whole affair, I felt like it was akin to a visit to the dentist: Nothing to worry about too much, but not pleasant, either. I still think that's true. And yet my stomach is knotted and gurgling with concern.
Moving on to more important things, let's chat a bit about this swine flu issue. Specifically, let's chat about how it is being blown out of all proportion and for the first time in a while I wish someone would muzzle the media. I understand that this virus is having a devastating effect in Mexico and that it clearly has the ability to spread quickly between hosts. However, there is another important phenomenon not receiving nearly enough attention: Although the flu does seem to be spreading in the US, its lethality is far less there and in all other developed countries where it has been so far identified than it is in Mexico, a *less*developed*country*.
This should be no surprise. Influenza of any kind is most threatening for vulnerable groups, such as the elderly, the undernourished, and other people with generally lower levels of health. Less-developed countries are by definition populated by people with generally lower levels of health and/or malnutrition. So of course a particularly mobile strain of flu could be catastrophic for these people. This is sad, tragic even when one considers how preventable issues like malnutrition and poverty are -- or should be, if people were willing to allocate resources more effectively and fairly.
But while this is a sad, sad fact for Mexico and countries like Mexico, this is NOT cause for panic or for 'pandemic' designation. What you have is a national health crisis in Mexico, NOT a reason for people to sell all of their airline stocks or for the media to start using phrases like, 'World health officials race to stem deadly flu.' Maybe you could use, 'World health officials race to stem deadly (in Mexico but nowhere else) flu.' Anything beyond that at this time is just panic-mongering and these people -- journalists and to a lesser extent health officials -- should be ashamed of themselves for using their positions in such a way.
I will be the first to revise my position in the future if the cases in the US and Canada become more serious (in fact, I'll probably be among the first to contract the damn flu if it gets that bad), but for the moment all you have is a flu virus that is affecting a vulnerable population in a predictable way and NOT affecting a healthier population in an also predictable way. The effects of viral mutation and adaption make it entirely possible that the strain will strengthen and become more deadly, even among 'healthy' people. But these same effects could equally lead to a weakened virus, so I still say there is no reason for such hysteria at this time.
Now go outside and cough on someone you love.
I don't think things went badly. The external reviewer took up most of the time asking questions that seemed reasonable and relevant, a marked (and welcome) change from past discussions of my research proposal. I feel pretty confident that I answered the questions well and demonstrated some capability. Our nefarious head of research was as usual negative, but this was expected and since the external guy took up so much time, her venom was enhanced by irritation at having only five minutes to inform me that she still does not see the scientific value of my proposed work. (I was amused to see the external reviewer's eyebrows shoot up wonderingly at this remark.)
Going in to this whole affair, I felt like it was akin to a visit to the dentist: Nothing to worry about too much, but not pleasant, either. I still think that's true. And yet my stomach is knotted and gurgling with concern.
Moving on to more important things, let's chat a bit about this swine flu issue. Specifically, let's chat about how it is being blown out of all proportion and for the first time in a while I wish someone would muzzle the media. I understand that this virus is having a devastating effect in Mexico and that it clearly has the ability to spread quickly between hosts. However, there is another important phenomenon not receiving nearly enough attention: Although the flu does seem to be spreading in the US, its lethality is far less there and in all other developed countries where it has been so far identified than it is in Mexico, a *less*developed*country*.
This should be no surprise. Influenza of any kind is most threatening for vulnerable groups, such as the elderly, the undernourished, and other people with generally lower levels of health. Less-developed countries are by definition populated by people with generally lower levels of health and/or malnutrition. So of course a particularly mobile strain of flu could be catastrophic for these people. This is sad, tragic even when one considers how preventable issues like malnutrition and poverty are -- or should be, if people were willing to allocate resources more effectively and fairly.
But while this is a sad, sad fact for Mexico and countries like Mexico, this is NOT cause for panic or for 'pandemic' designation. What you have is a national health crisis in Mexico, NOT a reason for people to sell all of their airline stocks or for the media to start using phrases like, 'World health officials race to stem deadly flu.' Maybe you could use, 'World health officials race to stem deadly (in Mexico but nowhere else) flu.' Anything beyond that at this time is just panic-mongering and these people -- journalists and to a lesser extent health officials -- should be ashamed of themselves for using their positions in such a way.
I will be the first to revise my position in the future if the cases in the US and Canada become more serious (in fact, I'll probably be among the first to contract the damn flu if it gets that bad), but for the moment all you have is a flu virus that is affecting a vulnerable population in a predictable way and NOT affecting a healthier population in an also predictable way. The effects of viral mutation and adaption make it entirely possible that the strain will strengthen and become more deadly, even among 'healthy' people. But these same effects could equally lead to a weakened virus, so I still say there is no reason for such hysteria at this time.
Now go outside and cough on someone you love.
